Authors:
Ashot G.Tamrazyan,Ivan K.Manaenkov,Dmitry D. Koroteev,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.03.00062Keywords:
Indirect reinforcement,Welding mesh,Plastic destruction,Deformability,Four-point bending,Abstract
One of the design solutions, saving materials and increasing strength and deformation characteristics of concrete, is the use of indirect reinforcement. The volume of research devoted this problem for bending elements in comparison with compressed elements, is rather low. The aim of the research work is to analyze the influence of the indirect reinforcement on strength and deformation characteristics of the reinforced concrete beams. The test results of three batches of the beams with indirect reinforcement of compressed area in form of cross-welding mesh are given in the research work. Each batch consisted of the sample without mesh and two samples with various coefficients of the indirect reinforcement of compressed area. The batches were different from each other by the area of longitudinal reinforcement. The pattern change from brittle to plastic destruction of the samples was identified in the results of research. In this case, the limit deformability increases considerably with saving the high residual bearing capacity. We noticed that the influence of the indirect reinforcement on the beams work depends on not only coefficient of indirect reinforcement but also the area of longitudinal reinforcement. We explain it by growth of large deformation in concrete of the compressed area in the limit condition and, therefore, more effective inclusion of the indirect reinforcement. The bending reduction is 7.2-14.4% for the samples with mesh, the increase of the bending moment, satisfying the beginning of the concrete destruction of the compressed area, is 11-33%.Refference:
I.Attard M., Samani A.K. (2012). A stress–strain model for uniaxial and confined concrete under compression. Engineering Structures, 41: 335-349.II.Binici B. (2005). An analytical model for stress–strain behavior of confined concrete. Engineering Structures, 27: 1040–1051.
III.ChoiE., ParkS., ChoB., Hui, D. (2013). Lateral reinforcement of welded SMA rings for reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 577S: 756-759.
IV.ChungH., Yang K., Lee Y., Eun H.. (2002). Stress–strain curve of laterally confined concrete. Engineering Structures. Engineering Structures, 24: 1153-1163.
V.Georgios G. and Lam D. (2004). Axial capacity of circular concrete-filled tube columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60: 1049-1068.
VI.Hadi M., Elbasha N. (2008), Displacement Ductility of Helically Confined HSC Beams. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2: 270-279.
VII.Kharun M., Nikolenko Y.V., Stashevskaya N.A., Koroteev D.D. (2017). Thermal Treatment of Self-Compacting Concrete in Cast-In Situ Construction. Key Engineering Materials, 753: 315-320.
VIII.Krishan A.L., Troshkina E.A., Chernyshova E.P. (2016). Efficient design of concrete filled steel tube columns. Procedia Engineering, 150: 1709-1714.
IX.Long Y., Cai J. (2013). Stress–strain relationship of concrete confined by rectangular steel tubes with binding bars. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 88: 1-14.X.Lu X., Hsu C. (2007). Stress–strain relations of high-strength concrete under triaxial compression. Journal Of Materials In Civil Engineering, 19(3): 261-268.
XI.Nemecek J., Padevet P., Patzak B. and Bittnar Z. (2005). Effect of transversal reinforcement in normal and high strength concrete columns. Materials and Structures, 38: 665-671.
XII.Pessiki S., Graybeal B. (2000). Axial Load Tests of Concrete Compression Members with High Strength Spiral Reinforcement. PCI Journal, Mar-Apr: 64-80