Authors:
A.S. Markovich,V.S. Kuznetsov,Yu. A. Shaposhnikova,M.I. Abu Mahadi,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.03.00038Keywords:
Monolithic Flat Overlap,Monostrend ,Tensioning Armature, Deflection ,Contour Prestressed Reinforcement,Abstract
Excessively large deflections in the center of the slab are one of the most significant drawbacks that prevent the spread of monolithic flat ceilings during spans of more than 7 m. The influence of the application of contour prestressed reinforcement (in a shell) without adhesion to concrete on the deflections of plates with the aspect ratio a/b=1÷2 is considered in the article. In the work presented, the rope laying path in the slab is represented by a part of the parabola passing through the supports, with a height that is equal to the deflection, and the length of the rope's diagonal is equal to the distance between the column axes. Knowing the initial equation of the curved axis of the rope, it is possible to calculate the values of the repulsive forces by integrating this parabola equation and obtain a formula for determining the intensity of the repulsion at any point along the length of the rope. With the help of the finite element method, the deflections of a cell of a flat plate were obtained, where the deflection was taken into account in the form of concentrated forces applied at the nodes of the grid of finite elements along the cell contour. According to the results of the study, it is established that the use of a contour high-strength prestressed reinforcement without adhesion to concrete can reduce the deflections of the slab of overlap up to 15% or more. When prestressing only on one side of the cell, it is possible to advise on the installation of prestressed ropes only on the long side of the slab with a ratio of sides a/b=1.3 or more, because the installation on the short side is not advisable.Refference:
I.ACI 318-05(2004). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary.
II.Article (2016). Methods for fixing the valve by pulling. See also URL: http://msd.com.ua/texnologiya-betonnyx-i-zhelezobetonnyx-izdelii/sposoby-zakrepleniya-armatury-pri-natyazhenii/.
III.Bardysheva Yu.A., Kuznecov V.S., Talyzova Yu.A. (2014). Constructive solutions beamless floors without capitals with prestressed reinforcement.Vestnik MGSU,6:44-51.
IV.BS8110(2010). British Standart. Structural use of concrete.
V.CitnikovS.L., MirjushenkoE.F. (2016).Method for manufacturing prestressed concrete structures and monostrend. Patent for the invention No 2427686. Mosсow. See also URL: http://www.freepatent.ru/patents/2427686.
VI.Dzjuba I.S., Vatin N.I., Kuznecov V.D. (2008), Solid-span ribbed slab with aftertension. Civil Engineering Journal,1:5-12.VII.EN 1992-1-1 (1998). La norme NBN. Eurocode 2.
VIII.ETA-06/0022 (2005). Dywidag bonded post-tensioning system for 3 to 37 strands (140 and 150 mm2).
IX.ETA-03/0036(2004). Post-tensioning kit for prestressing of structures with unbonded mo-nostrands for concrete.
X.Information Sheet (2016). “CPM Builder. Elements of prestressing systems. Coupler type M / ME. See also URL: http://psk-stroitel.ru/oborudovanie/elementy-sistem-prednapryazheniya/kupler-tipa-m-me.html.
XI.KarpilovskijV.S. (2015). SCAD OFFICE. Computer complex Scad. Moscow: ASV, 274-283XII.Kishinevskaja E.V., Vatin N.I., Kuznecov V.D. (2009). Reinforcement of building constructions with aftertension concrete. Civil Engineering Journal,3:29-32.
XIII.Kremnev V.A., Kuznecov V.S., Talyzova Yu.A. (2014). Features of distribution of stresses in the slab beamless floors of prestressing force. Vestnik MGSU,9:48-53.
XIV.Kuznecov V.S., Shaposhnikova Yu.A. (2015). By definition, the stress in the reinforcement without adhesion to concrete slabs in beamless. Industrial and Civil Engineering,3: 50-53.
XV.Kuznecov V.S., Shaposhnikova Yu.A. (2016). Determination of deflections beamless floors reinforced with prestressed diagonal reinforcement without adhesion to concrete. Scientific Review,21:50-55.
XVI.Kuznecov V.S., Shaposhnikova Yu.A. (2016). Determination of stress-strain state beamless floors with mixed reinforcement. Industrial and Civil Engineering,2: 54-57.
XVII.Kuznecov V.S., Shaposhnikova Yu.A. (2016). On the definition deflections of monolithic slabs with the mixed reinforcing at the stage of limit equilibrium. MATEC Web of Conferences. See also URL: http://www.matec-conferences.org/.
XVIII.Kuznecov V.S., Shaposhnikova Yu.A. (2016). The strength of prestressed reinforced beamless floors in the stages of production and destruction. System Technologies,1/18:85-92.
XIX.Manual for the Design of Concrete Building Structures to Eurocode 2 (2006). Institution of Structural Engineers. London.
XX.Morozov A. (2016). BIM in Russia: prestressed concrete -two approaches for modeling in Revit-Robot. See also URL: http://bim-fea.blogspot.ru/2012/09/bim-revit-robot.html.
XXI.Muttoni A. (2012). Conception et dimensionnement de la precontrainte, Ecole polyhtechnique federale, Lausanne.
XXII.Paille G.M. (2013). Calcul des structures en beton arme, AFNOR, Paris.
XXIII.Portaev D.V. (2011). Calculation and design of monolithic prestressed structures of civil buildings. ASVPublisher, Moscow, Russia.
XXIV.Portaev D.V. (2016). Experience the calculation of monolithic prestressed structures in SCAD software complex using the method of equivalent loadings. See also URL: http://scadsoft.com/download/Portaev2012.pdf.
XXV.Seinturiere R. (2006), Etat Limite de service, IUT, Génie, Civil de Grenoble.XXVI.SP52-103-2007(Regulation Code 52-103-2007)(2007). Concrete monolithic construction of buildings.
XXVII.TKP 45-5.03-135-2009 (02250) (2010). Reinforced concrete prestressed structures without coupling reinforcement with concrete. Design Rules. Ministry of Architecture and Construction of Belarus. Minsk.
View | Download