Authors:
A. S. Markovich,V.S. Kuznetsov,M. I. Abu Mahadi,Yu. A. Shaposhnikova,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.spl.4/2019.11.00009Keywords:
Bending angle,Bending rod,Mandrel,Monolithic construction,Reinforcement,Reinforcement,clamp,Reinforcing bar,Reinforcing pin,Relative deformation,Rod armature,Steel stretching diagram,Abstract
In monolithic construction, when manufacturing reinforcing articles on a construction site, technological requirements for the bending of rods may not always be observed. In various regulatory documents, there are differences in the technological requirements for this operation. The article presents the results of studies of the stressstrain state of reinforcement in the manufacture of clamps, pins and other products related to the bending of rods. Normative requirements and calculated values of limiting relative deformations for various classes of reinforcement and mandrel diameters are given. The recommendations of norms on the diameters of rods and mandrels in the manufacture of bent rods are checked and refined. The relative elongations or shortening of the fibers of the rod are determined by the difference in arc lengths of the midline and arc at a distance x from the midline. According to the results of the work, graphs of the distribution of the relative elongations of the rods are presented for different diameters of the mandrels as a function of the distance from the axis of the section. Plastic deformations develop practically over the entire cross-sectional area of the rod. The use of mandrels with radius less than R = 5r at the bending of armatures А400 and А500S is connected by the risk of cracking, delamination or destruction of the rod. The use of mandrels made from reinforcing bars A240 with mandrels of radius R = 2r is unacceptable, since edge deformations reach 35%, which exceeds the normative values and leads to the destruction of the rod. Also, the boundaries of the ratio of mandrel diameters for smooth reinforcement A240 and periodic A500S are presented. The results of this study can be used in practical work, as well as to establish the minimum mandrel diameters when using new types of reinforcement with other physical and mechanical properties.Refference:
I. A manual for the design of concrete and reinforced concrete structures from
heavy concrete without prestressing reinforcement (to SP 52-101-2003)
(2005). Moscow.
II. ACI 318-05 (2004). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and
Commentary.
III. ASTM A82/A82M-07 (2013). Standard Specification for Steel Wire, Plain,
for Concrete Reinforcement, Withdrawn.
IV. BS 4466 (1989). Specification for scheduling, dimensioning, bending and
cutting of steel reinforcement for concrete.
V. BS 8110 (2010). British Standart. Structural use of concrete.
VI. BS 970-1 (1996). Specification for wrought steels for mechanical and allied
engineering purposes. Part 1: General inspection and testing procedures and
specific requirements for carbon, carbon manganese, alloy and stainless
steels.
VII. BS 970-2 (1988). Wrought steel for mechanical and allied engineering
purposes. Part 2: Requirements for steels for the manufacture of hot formed
springs
VIII. BS 970-3 (1991). Wrought steel for mechanical and allied engineering
purposes. Part 3: Bright bars for gene
IX. engineering purposes.
X. Bedarev A.V. (2014). Calculation of the cross-section of the reinforcement of
the zone of anchoring of the armature of the periodic profile. Pp. 193-203.
XI. Concrete and reinforced concrete – look in the future. Scientific works of the
III All-Russian (II International) Conference on Concrete and Reinforced
Concrete: in 7 volumes (2014). Publisher: National Research Moscow State
Building University, Moscow.
XII. EN 1992-1-1 (1998). La norme NBN. Eurocode 2.
XIII. GOST 12004-83 (2015). Steel reinforcing. Methods of tensile testing.
XIV. GOST 14019-2003 (2015). Methods of testing for bending.
XV. GOST 5781-82 (2015). Hot-rolled steel for the reinforcement of reinforced
concrete structures, Moscow.
XVI. GOST R 52544-2006 (2018). Rolled reinforced welded periodic profiles of
classes A500C and B500C for reinforcement of reinforced concrete and stone
structures, Moscow.
XVII. GOST R 54257-2010 (2011). Reliability of building structures and
foundations, Moscow.
XVIII. Kuznecov V.S., Shaposhnikova Yu.A. (2016). On the definition deflections
of monolithic slabs with the mixed reinforcing at the stage of limit
equilibrium. MATEC Web of Confer-ences (Web of Science). See also URL:
http://www.matec-conferences.org/.
XIX. Loganov V. A., Bogdanov V.P. (2008). Mechanism of the cutting and
bending of the end of the connecting network rings. Patent for utility model
№74837, Russia.
XX. Manual for the Design of Concrete Building Structures to Eurocode 2 (2006).
Institution of Structural Engineers. London.
XXI. Paille G.M. (2013). Calcul des structures en beton arme, AFNOR, Paris.
XXII. Seinturiere R. (2006), Etat Limite de service, IUT, Génie, Civil de Grenoble.
XXIII. SP 52-103-2007 (2007). Concrete monolithic construction of buildings.
XXIV. SP 63.13330.2012 (2015). Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. Basic
provisions. Updated version of SNiP 52-01-2003, Moscow.