Authors:
Y. Kah Yung,H.S. Chua,M. J. K. Bashir,F.Y.C.Albert,Sunil Govinda,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.03.00025Keywords:
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT),Perturb and Observe (P&O),Central Composite Design (CCD),Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Design ofExperiment (DOE) Optimization of Parameters,Abstract
This paper focus on the CCD with RSM optimization of parameters. Design of Experiment (DoE) hardware was developed with P&O MPPT algorithm to measure Input A: Input Voltage (VIN), Input B: Input Current (IIN), Input C: Duty Cycle, Input D: Irradiance and output power. The optimization of process parameters was successfully identified from the experimental design and CCD results. The coefficient of determination of R2 is shown 99.89% which is a good fit in the model. The adequacy prevision of 89.437 indicated an adequate signal and noise was negligible. The optimization of a set of experimental parameters and observed results were VIN: 18.82 V, IIN: 0.65A, Duty Cycle: 85% and Irradiance: 883.79 W/m2. Overall, we concluded that input voltage is the most significant term influencing output power, following by input current, duty cycle and irradiance. All results were validated by experiments, simulations and theory calculation. The validation error results between predicted and experimental output power were shown that a maximum error at +3.65% and a minimum error at 0.00%, which had validated the accuracy of the prediction.Refference:
I.Ahmed.O.Mohamed Zain,C. Huang Shen, Sunil Govinda, F.Y.C. Albert,Ammar AM Al-Talib (2017). Matlab Design and Power Analysis of MPPT Controller for Solar PV using Perturb and Observation Algorithm.REEGETECH 2017.
II.Carré, A. and Mittal, K.L.(2011). Experimental Design. Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Cell Adhesion, CRC Press. pp 355.
III.Demirel, M. and Kayan, B.(2012). Application of response surface methodology and central composite design for optimization of textile dye degradation by wet air oxidation. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 1-10.
IV.Femia, F., Petrone,G., Spagnuolo, G. and Vitelli, M. (2005). Optimization of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Method. IEEE Transactions On Power Electronics, 20, 963-973.
V.Hart, D.W. (2010). Power Electronics. McGraw-Hill Education, 196-264.
VI.Hussain Mutlag, A., Mohamed, A. and Shareef, H. (2016). A comparative study of artificial intelligent-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaicsystems. International Conference on Advances in Renewable Energy and Technologies. 1-4.
VII.Lichtfouse, E., Schwarzbauer, J. and Robert, D. (2013). Response Surface Method and Central Composite Design. Green Materials for Energy, Products and Depollution. 397.
VIII.Montgomery, C.C. (2005). Multiple Regression Assumptions, Diagnostics and Efficacy Measures: Cook’s Distance. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, USA. 185.
IX.Othman, A.M., Elsayed, M.A., Elshafei, A.M. and Hassan, M.M. (2017). Application of Response Surface Methodology to Optimize the Extracellular Fungal Mediated Nanosilver Green Synthesis. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 497-504.
X.Pant, M., Deep, K., Nagar, A. and Bansal, J.C. (2014). Regression Analysis Concept. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Springer, Volume 2, 824.
XI.Prashanthi, M. and Rajakumar, S. (2016). Box Behnken Experimental Design and Responses. Integrated Waste Management in India: Status and Future Prospects for Environmental Sustainability. Springer,184.
XII.Sarrai, A.E., Hanini, S., Merzouk, N.K., Tassalit, D., Sazbo, T., Hernadi, K. and Nagy, L. (2016). Using Central Composite Experimental Design to Optimize the Degradation of Tylosin from Aqueous Solution by Photo-Fenton Reaction. Molecular Diversity Preservation International and Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. 428.
View | Download