Authors:
Dmitry D. Koroteev,Makhmud Kharun,Nadezhda A. Stashevskaya,Galina E. Okolnikova,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.03.00030Keywords:
Transformable Quick assembling,Single-storey house,Sandwich-panels,Construction process,Abstract
Quick-assembling single-storey houses are one of the possible design solutions if we want to get ready-made houses in short time. It is especially important in locations where new factories and plants, fields of the fossil fuels extraction are developed, various catastrophes occurred and there is a necessity to carry out recovery works. However, the spread of quick-assembling single-storey houses slows down because of design, arrangement and technological complications, which should be settled comprehensively. The aim of the research work is to provide competiveness of such houses by improving their manufacturing level, which includes design, arrangement and technological solutions, reducing price and time of getting ready-made houses. The manufacturing level is determined by labor input, time and cost parameters. The research results show that the design solution, improving manufacturing level, is the use of prefabricated flat packets of sandwich-panels, which transform into design position during the assembling process due to transformable joints. The transportation of the flat packets can be carried out if their size allows transporting them by road transport. The arrangement and technological sustainability of the construction system includes the following stages: selection of separate arrangement and technological conditions of the system; determination of groups of arrangement, technological and economic factors, which influence on sustainability of each condition of the construction system, determination of rational spheres of influence of arrangement and technological factors on cost of the transformable houses. The developed solutions can reduce cost and time of the assembling process and improve manufacturing level of single-storey houses.Refference:
I.Abdolpour H., Garzón-Roca J., Escusa G., Sena-Cruz J.M., Barros J.A.O., Valente I.B. (2016) Development of a composite prototype with GFRP profiles and sandwich panels used as a floor module of an emergency house. Composite Structures, 153: 81-95.
II.Bygballe L.E., Ingemansson M. (2014) The logic of innovation in construction. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3): 512-524.
III.Chardon S., Brangeon B., Bozonnet E., Inard C. (2016) Construction cost and energy performance of single-family houses: From integrated design to automated optimization. Automation in Construction, 70:1-13.
IV.Chirkunova E.K., Kireeva E.E., Kornilova A.D., Pschenichnikova J.S. (2016) Research of Instruments for Financing of Innovation and Investment Construction Projects. Procedia Engineering, 153: 112-117.
V.ELZomor M., Parrish K. (2016) Investigating Building Construction Process and Developing a Performance Index. Procedia Engineering, 145: 211-218.
VI.Eyers D.R., Potter A.T. (2017) Industrial Additive Manufacturing: A manufacturing systems perspective. Computers in Industry, 92-93: 2018-2018.
VII.Fernando P.L.N., Jayasinghe M.T.R., Jayasinghe C. (2017) Structural feasibility of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) based lightweight concrete sandwich wall panels. Construction and Building Materials, 139: 45-51.
VIII.Ferreira R., Pereira D., Gago A., Proenca J. (2016) Experimental characterization of cork agglomerate core sandwich panels for wall assemblies in buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 5: 194-210.
IX.Gara F., Ragni L., Roia D., Dezi L. (2012) Experimental tests and numerical modelling of wall sandwich panels. Engineering Structures, 37: 193-204.
X.Gopinath S., Kumar R.V., Sheth H., Murthy A.R., Iyer N.R. (2014) Pre-fabricated sandwich panels using cold-formed steel and textile reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 64: 54-59.
XI.Iqbal M.I., Himmler R., Gheewala S.H. (2018) Environmental impacts reduction potential througha PV based transition from typical to energy plus houses in Thailand: A life cycle perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37: 307-322.
XII.Koroteev D.D., Kharun M., Stashevskaya N.A. (2017) Manufacturing of concrete elements on mobile polygons withthe using of solar energy.International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(10): 10-14.
XIII.Lee J., Park Y., Choi C., Han C. (2017) BIM-assisted labor productivity measurement method for structural formwork. Automation in Construction, 84: 121-132.
XIV.Motuziene V., Rogoza A., Lapinskiene V., Vilutiene T. (2016) Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(1): 532-541.
XV.PremrovM., Leskovar V., Mihalic K. (2016) Influence of the building shape on the energy performance of timber-glass buildings in different climatic conditions. Energy, 108:201-211.
XVI.Rantala T., Ukko J., Saunila M., Havukainen J. (2018) The effect of sustainability in the adoption of technological, service, and business model innovations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 46-55.