Authors:
Engr Uzair Ali,Engr Syed Shujaat Ali,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2020.01.00021Keywords:
Flooding,Flood Forecasting,Floodplain Zoning,Hydraulic Model,Dimensional Approach,HEC RAS,MIKE,Abstract
Flooding is considered to be one of the worst natural catastrophes effecting million of people throughout the world. Flooding is referred to as potentially destructive abundance of water in a normally dry location. Flooding occurs when water inundate the areas adjacent to the river channel called as the floodplain, causing potential damage to the inhabitants of that area. Thus, a proper flood forecasting system including the development of flood zoning maps, the right of river bed and extent of inundation of floodplain are required for these areas. A composite river hydraulic model provide basis for the development of forecasting system providing timely management of future flood events. Several computer programs are used for the simulation of these models based on either one- or two-dimensional modelling approach. As there are variety of performance capabilities and access to the data required for the development of these hydraulic models, thus it is essential to choose the best software related to those models. A review of various wellknownmodels developed on different software for flood forecasting has been presented in this paper that address the performance of software and the analysis techniques adopted to produce final results.Refference:
I. Abdollahi, A., Bajestan, M. S., Hasounizadeh, H. & Rostami, S. 2007.
Comparing the results of Hec-Ras & Mike 11 models in a Segment of
Karoon River. 7th International River Engineering Conference. Shahid
ChamranUniversity, Ahwaz.
II. Aerts, J.C.J.H., Major, D., Bowman, M. and Dircke, P., 2009, Connecting
Delta Cities: Coastal Cities, Flood Risk Management and Adaptation to
Climate Change, VU University Press, Amsterdam p. 96.
III. Ahmad ShahiriParsa, Mohammad Heydari and Noor FarahainbtMohd
Amin., 2013, Introduction to floodplain zoning simulation models through
dimensional approach: International Journal of Advancements Civil
Structural and Environmental Engineering – IJACSE v. 1, p. 20-23
IV. Aronica, G., B. Hankin, and K. Beven. “Uncertainty and equifinality in
calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model
with limited data.” Advances in Water Resources, 1998: 349-365.
V. Aronica, G., B. Hankin, and K. Beven. “Uncertainty and equifinality in
calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in flood propagation model
with limited data.” Advances in Water Resources, 1998: 349-365.
VI. Bales, J.D., and C.R. Wagner. “Source of uncertainty in flood inundation
maps.” Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2009: 139-147.
VII. Barkhordar, M. &Chavoshian, S. A. 2001. Floodplain zoning. Technical
Workshop on Nonstructural flood management.
VIII. Bemani, M., Torani, M. &Chezgheh, S. 2012. Determination of floodplain
zoning by HEC-RAS Model. Journal of Geography and Environmental
Hazards, No. I, 16.
IX. Booij, M.J., 2005, Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with
different spatial model resolutions: Journal of Hydrology, v. 303, p. 176–
198.
X. Bouwer, L.M., Crompton, R.P., Faust, E., Höppe, P. and Pielke, Jr., R.A.,
2007, ‘Confronting Disaster Losses’, Science, (318) 753.
XI. Bronstert, A., 2003, Floods and climate change: interactions and impacts:
Risk Analysis, v. 23(3), p. 545-557.
XII. Burby, R.J., 2001, ‘Flood insurance and floodplain management: The US
experience’, Environmental Hazards, (3/3–4) 111–122.
XIII. DHI. MIKE 21 Flow Model: Hydrodynamic Module Scientific
Documentation. MIKE by DHI, 2009.
J. Mech. Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-15, No.-1, January (2020) pp 275-282
Copyright reserved © J. Mech. Cont.& Math. Sci.
Engr Uzair Ali et al
282
XIV. Fayazi, M., Bagheri, A., Sedghi, H., Keyhan, K. & Kaveh, F. 2010 Flood
plains simulation of Kashkanriver, Lorestan, Iran with MIKE11& MIKE
FLOOD. 8th International River Engineering Conference. Shahid
ChamranUniversity, Ahwaz.
XV. Fleenor, W. E. Evaluation of Numerical Models… HEC-RAS and
DHIMIKE 11.
XVI. Frank, E., A. Ostan, M. Coccato, and G.S. Stelling. “Use of an integrated
one-dimensional/two-dimensional hydraulic modelling approach for flood
hazard and risk mapping.” In River Basin Management, by R.A. Falconer
and W.R Blain, 99-108. Southhampton, UK: WIT Press, 2001.
XVII. Garrote, L. and Bras, R.L., 1995. A distributed model for real-time flood
forecasting using digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology, 167(1-4):
279-306.
XVIII. Lin, B., J.M. Wicks, R.A. Falconer, and K. Adams. “Integrating 1D and 2D
hydrodynamic models for flood simulation.” Preceedings of the Institution
of Civil Engineers. Water Management Incorporated, 2006. 19-25.
XIX. Mashhadi, S. S., Rad, M. A., Memari, A. R. & Pour, S. J. 2012.
Determining of limits of river bed and its flow by using HEC-HMS 3.1.0
and Arcview 3.3 software (case study: Kakhk river in Gonabad). The first
National Conference on Desertification.
XX. Mason, D.C., D.M. Cobby, M.S. Horritt, and P.D. Bates. “Floodplain
friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using
vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry.”
Hydrological Processes, 2003: 1711-1732.
XXI. National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), annual report 2010:
Available at http:// www.ndma.gov.pk/.
XXII. Pappenberger, F., K. Beven, M. Horritt, and S. Blazkova. “Uncertainty in
the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using
inundation and downstream level observations.” Journal of Hydrology,
2004: 46-69.
XXIII. Patro, S., C. Chatterjee, S. Mohanty, R. Singh, and N.S. Raghuwanshi.
“Flood Inundation Modeling using MIKE FLOOD and Remote Sensing
Data.” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2009: 107-118.
XXIV. S. Néelz and G Pender. 2009, Desktop review of 2D hydraulic modelling
packages.
XXV. S. Néelz and G Pender. 2010, Benchmarking of 2D hydraulic modeling
packages
XXVI. Smemoe, C.M., E.J. Nelson, A.K. Zundel, and A.W. Miller. “Demonstrating
Floodplain Uncertainty Using Flood Probability Maps.” Journal of the
American Water Resources Association, 2007: 359-371.
XXVII. USGS. The National Map Seamless Server. August 19, 2008.
http://seamless.usgs.gov/products/3arc.php (accessed June 2015).
XXVIII. Werner, M.G.F. “Impact of Grid Size in GIS Based FLood Extent Mapping
Using a 1D Flow Model.” Phys. Chem. Earth Part B-Hydrol. Oceans
Atmos., 2001: 517-522.