Sensitivity enhancement and comparison of MEMS/NEMS cantilevers

Authors:

Anuj Kumar Goel,B.Hari krishna,S.Poongodi,

DOI NO:

https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.02.00029

Keywords:

MEMS,Microcantilevers,COMSOL Multiphysics,

Abstract

MEMS, macroscopic devices posses characteristic length of less than 1μm and integrate mechanical and electronic components on a single chip. Sensitivity is the major concern in existing MEMS/NEMS devices which are mostly made of elastic cantilever beam. In this work porous MEMS cantilevers are designed using Silicon dioxide, Polysilicon, Silicon nitride & Aluminium. The designed cantilevers are in the micrometer range with optimized dimension as l=120, w=10 and t=1.5 (all are in micrometers). Sensitivity is measured on Silicon dioxide based cantiliver with different type of hole on fixed end as rectangle, circle and ellipse. The ellipse hole gives better result (maximum resultant stress 1767.5 N/m2) in terms of sensitivity of the device. Futher elliptical hole parameters (position, number and dimension) are varied in order to achieve maximum stress and in response maximum deflection of microcantilevers. The optimized design achieved is implemented with two more materials viz. polysilicon and silicon nitride for comparison.

Refference:

I.Ansari, M.Z., Cho, C., Kim, J.,Bang, B. Comparison between deflection and vibration characteristics of rectangular and trapezoidal profile microcantilevers. Sensors2009, 9, 2706–2718.

II.Anuj Kumar Goel. Analytical modeling and simulation of microcantilever based MEMS devices. Wulfenia, 2017, vol. 24, No.1, pp.79-91.

III.Anuj Kumar Goel, Kuldip Kumar, Dushyant Gupta. Design and Simulation of Microcantilevrs for Sensing applications. International Journal of applied engineering research, 2016, Vol. 11 No. 1 pp 501-503.

IV.ChivukulaV,Wang M,Ji HF,KhaliqA,FangJ&VarahramyanK. Simulation of SiO based piezoresistive microcantilevers. Sensors andActuatorsA, 2006; vol.125: pp.526-533.

V.Fernando, S., Austin, M., Chaffey, J. Improved cantilever profiles for sensor elements. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.2007, 40, 7652–7655.

VI.Madhu Santosh Ku Mutyala, Deepika Bandhanadham, Liu Pan, Vijaya Rohini Pendyala, Hai-Feng Ji. Mechanical and electronic approaches to improve the sensitivity of microcantilever sensors. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2009, Vol. 25. No. 1. pp 1-12.

VII.Mansour Abtahi, Gholamreza Vossoughi, Ali Meghdari. Full Operational Range Dynamic Modeling of Microcantilever Beams. Journal of Microelectromechanical systems, 2013,Vol. 22. No. 5.

VIII.Mansour Abtahi, GholamrezaVossoughi, Ali Meghdari. Full Operational Range Dynamic Modeling of Microcantilever Beams. Journal of Microelectromechanicalsystems,.2013, Vol. 22. No. 5.

IX.Naeli, K., Brand, O.Cantilever sensor with stress-concentrating piezoresistor design, Sensors, 2005 IEEE, pp. 592–595.

X.RasmussenPA,HansenO&Boisen A. Cantilever surface stress sensors with single crystalline silicon piezoresistors. Applied physics letter, 2005; Vol. 86.

XI.Shahriar Kouravand. esign and modeling of some sensing and actuating mechanisms for MEMS applications, Applied Mathematical Modelling. Elsevier,2011,Vol. 35. pp 5173–5181.

Anuj Kumar Goel, B.Hari krishna, S.Poongodi View Download