SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT HANGING COLUMNS

Authors:

Rex J, A. S. Dilip Kumar,J. Selwyn Babu ,

DOI NO:

https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2020.09.00003

Keywords:

storey shear,lateral burden,storey displacements,response spectrum, ETABS,

Abstract

A-pillar is a vertical section, preliminary from footing level also shifting weight to the base. Hanging or stub section similarly a precipitous element which closes (as of model design/site condition) on its base level, lies on level part i.e., beam (horizontal section). Such sections (hanging or stub) where the burden was mulled over using point load. Present examination on G+12 model with/without hanging section is studied by applying response spectrum & time history procedures beneath quake load at zone two also differentiates with storey shears, lateral burden, storey relocations, storey drifts by using Etabs. From the final output, it was clear that storey shears, lateral burden, storey displacements, storey drifts are increased for the model without hanging sections concerning model with hanging section. 

Refference:

I. Ajim G. Mujawar and Mohasinkhan N. Bargir (2020) Earthquake Analysis of High-Rise structure with hanging Column, International conference of emerging trends in engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24314-2_23

II. Anil Chopra, structural dynamics, applications and theory of earthquake engineering (third edition).

III. E.M Lui and Awkar J. C (1997), Seismic analysis of multi-storey semirigid frames”, Page no: 425-442, Issue 5, volume 21, Journal of Engineering Structures.

IV. G. Iyappan, N. Elakkiyarajan, And A. Naveen (2018) Seismic Analysis of Multi-storey structure with hanging Column.). (IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719 PP 42-48)

V. I.S 1893, Part 1(2002) codebook of design of seismic force resistant structures. (https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.1893.1.2002.pdf).

VI. I.S.456, (2000) code of plain and R.C. structures. (https://elibrarywcl.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/plain-and-reinforced-concrete.pdf).

VII. Lale, Kadam, Waykule (2016), studied oat conduct on the hanging column for seismic analysis of the multi-storey structure. IJCIET Volume 7 Issue 6. http://www.iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/uploadfolder/IJCIET_07_06_075/IJCIET_07_06_075.pdf.

VIII. Martin Williams, structural dynamics (first edition).

IX. Shashikant. K. Duggal, Seismic force resistant structures design (second edition).

X. Syed tajodeen (2014), seismic analysis of multi-storey structure with hangingcolumns.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282905209_SEISMIC_ANALYSIS_OF_MULTISTOREY_BUILDING_WITH_FLOATING_COLUMNS.
XI. Usama Ali*1, Naveed Ahmad2, Yaseen Mahmood3, Hamza Mustafa4, Mehre Munir5, A comparison of Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Resisting Beam-Column Joints vs. Weak Beam Column Joints Using Seismostruct, J. Mech. Cont.& Math. Sci.,Vol.-14, No.-3, May-June (2019), pp 289-314.
XII. Yaseen Mahmood*1, Khan Shahzada2, Usama Ali3, Abdul Farhan4, Syed Shujaat Ali Shah5, Fawad Ahmad6, FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SEISMIC RESILIENCE OF CITIES, J. Mech. Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.-5, September – October (2019), 42-49

View Download