Authors:
Veera Bhadra Chary.Gade,K.Mercy Rosalina,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.12.00058Keywords:
IEEE 57 bus,Load Flow tool,Power Flow,positive sequence,Simulink model,thermal energy systems,Abstract
The approach of symmetrical components of power flow analysis is the very salient technique to inspect the bus power flows in a 3-phase unbalanced and balanced power system network during the healthy or unhealthy case operation. There are various traditional programs available in the literature,which solve the single-phase equivalent power system models for power flow analysis. The main aim of this paper is to conduct a positive sequence power flow analysis on a balanced 3- phase IEEE 57 bus test case matlab Simulink model by using the Load Flow Tool. The present power system model consists of 7 thermal energy systems, each system configured with IEEE type-1 Excitation, Steam turbine, and Governor. The simulation study is useful for finding the bus voltages, active power losses and reactive power losses in the lines. However, there is an empirical analysis conducted with present results with the test case. There is a voltage improvement is observed at the buses with the present model. The efficiency of the model and convergence criteria perceive with the simulation results report. The simulink model is also useful for the steadystate analysis of power system network as well as the power flow analysis of the network with various grid connected renewable energy sources.Refference:
I. ARTURO LOSI, AND MARIO RUSSO, “OBJECT-ORIENTED LOAD FLOW FOR
RADIAL AND WEAKLY MESHED DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS,” IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 18, NO. 4, PP 1265 – 1274, NOV.
2003.
II. FAISAL MUMTAZ, M. H. SYED, MOHAMED AL HOSANI, AND H. H.
ZEINELDIN, “A NOVEL APPROACH TO SOLVE POWER FLOW FOR
ISLANDED MICROGRIDS USING MODIFIED NEWTON RAPHSON
WITH DROOP CONTROL OF DG,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, VOL. 7, NO. 2, PP 493 – 503, APRIL. 2016.
III. FEDERICO MILANO, “CONTINUOUS NEWTON’S METHOD FOR POWER FLOW
ANALYSIS,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 24, NO. 1, PP.
50–57, FEB. 2009.
IV. J. E. TATE AND T. J. OVERBYE, “A COMPARISON OF THE OPTIMAL
MULTIPLIER IN POLAR AND RECTANGULAR COORDINATES,” IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 20, NO. 4, PP. 1667–1674, NOV.
2005.
V. J. FLUECK AND H. D. CHIANG, “SOLVING THE NONLINEAR POWER FLOW
EQUATIONS WITH AN INEXACT NEWTON METHOD USING GMRES,” IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 13, NO. 2, PP. 267–273, MAY
1998.
VI. K. A. BIRT, J. J. GRAFFY, J. D. MCDONALD, AND A. H. EL-ABIAD, “THREE
PHASE LOAD FLOW PROGRAM,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS
AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 95, NO. 1, PP 59 – 65, FEB. 1976.
VII. L. M. C. BRAZ, C. A. CASTRO, AND C. A. F. MURARI, “A CRITICAL
EVALUATION OF STEP SIZE OPTIMIZATION BASED LOAD FLOW METHODS,”
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 15, NO. 1, PP. 202–207, FEB.
2000.
VIII. P. R. BIJWE AND S. M. KELAPURE, “NONDIVERGENT FAST POWER FLOW
METHODS,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS VOL. 18, NO. 2, PP.
633–638, MAY 2003.
IX. SEMLYEN, “FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF A KRYLOV SUBSPACE POWER
FLOW METHODOLOGY,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 11,
NO. 3, PP. 1528–1537, AUG. 1995.
X. SHARMA, NEELAM. “ANALYSIS OF LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE & ATPASE
ACTIVITY IN FISH, GAMBUSIA AFFINIS AT DIFFERENT PERIOD OF EXPOSURETO
CHLORPYRIFOS.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 4.1 (2014): 98-100.
XI. T. J. OVERBYE AND R. P. KLUMP, “EFFECTIVE CALCULATION OF POWER
SYSTEM LOW-VOLTAGE SOLUTIONS,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER
SYSTEMS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, PP. 75–82, FEB. 1996.
XII. T. J. OVERBYE, “COMPUTATION OF A PRACTICAL METHOD TO RESTORE
POWER FLOW SOLVABILITY,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS,
VOL. 10, NO. 1, PP. 280–287, FEB. 1995.
XIII. Y. CHEN AND C. SHEN, “A JACOBIAN-FREE NEWTON-GMRES(M) METHOD
WITH ADAPTIVE PRECONDITIONER AND ITS APPLICATION FOR POWER FLOW
CALCULATIONS,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 21, NO. 3,
PP. 1096–1103, AUG.2006.