Authors:
Mohamad Ariffin Abu Bakar,Norulhuda Ismail,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.06.00046Keywords:
Peer Tutoring,Metacognitive Skil,Thinking Skil,Active Learning,Mathematics Mastery,Abstract
Mastery of mathematics is an overview of the accuracy of mathematics competency. It is a tremendous impact on well development and complete trained metacognition skills and thinking skills. Therefore, to ensure that students can understand mathematics well is through learning that can enhance and develop metacognitive skills and thinking skills. In order to reduce the weakness of mathematical mastery, one of the interventions is through active and meaningful learning. Active learning focuses on student engagement, interactive, retention and motivation to explore the learning. Through this review, peer tutoring is subject matter to discuss the ability to support active learning and evaluate the effectiveness of peer tutoring activities among students in developing metacognitive skills and thinking skills. A review of previous research through search in database likes Google Scholar, Science Direct, ERIC, Springer Link, Elsevier and several other databases, based on keywords has been implemented. A number of articles and journals have been systematically reviewed to answer questions in this literature study. However, just 13 articles and journals published in 2012 until the current year are selected for this review. Briefly, the constructs and themes in peer tutoring contribute to forming active learning that can lead to increased student thinking and metacognitive skills.Refference:
I.A.B. Festus, “Activity-Based Learning Strategies in the Mathematics Classrooms”. Journal of Education and Practice.Vol.4, No.13,2013
II.A. Ansuategui, F. Jose, M. Miravet, &Lidon “Emotional and Cognitive Effects of Peer Tutoring among Secondary School Mathematics Students”.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and
Technology.Vol 48,n8,pp 1185-1205,2017
III.Adnan &ArsadBahri. “Beyond Effective Teaching: Enhancing Students’ Metacognitive Skill Through Guided Inquiry”. IOP Publishing .Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 954 (2018) 012022 doi :10.1088/1742-
6596/954/1/012022,2018.
IV.A. Elliot, “Metacognitive Teaching Strategies And Young Children’s Mathematical Learning”. Proceeding Of Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, AARE.Fremantle,1993
V.B. BozYaman, “A Multiple Case Study: What Happens In Peer Tutoring Of Calculus Studies?”.International Journal of Education in Mathematics,Science and Technology (IJEMST).7(1), 53-72.
Doi:10.18404/ijemst.328336,2019
VI.B. Hott, & J. Walker, “Peer Tutoring. Council for Learning Disabilities”.Retrived from : https://council-for-learning-disabilities.org/peer- tutoring-flexible-peer-mediated-strategy-that-involves-students-serving-as-
academic-tutors, 2012
VII.D. Al Kharusi, “What Positive Impacts Does Peer Tutoring Have Upon The Peer Tutors at SQU?”.Journal of Education and Practice.Vol.7, No.27, 2016.
VIII.D.S. Benders, “The Effect of Flexible Small Groups on Math Achievement in First Grade”. An On-line Journal forTeacherResearch.Vol. 18, Issue 1.Issn 2470-6353.Spring,2016
IX.F. Acar, & E. Ader.”Metacognition Used By Tutors During Peer Tutoring Sessions In Mathematics”.Elementary Education Online.2017; 16(3),pp 1185-1200,2017
X.F.U. Rahman, N.B. Jumani, M.A. Chaudry, S.U.H. Chisti, & F. Abbasi, “Impact Of Metacognitive Awareness On Performance Of Students In Chemistry”. Contemporary Issues In Education Research.Vol 3, No10,2010
XI.G. Pilten, “The Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocal Teaching Strategieson Comprehension of Expository Texts”. Journal of Education and Training Studies.Vol. 4, No. 10; October 2016. Doi:10.11114/jets.v4i10.1791,2016
XII.G. Schraw, & D. Moshman, (1995) . Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. 40. Retrieved From : http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/40 1995
XIII.H.C. Celik, “The Effects of Activity Based Learning on Sixth Grade Students’ Achievement and Attitudes towards Mathematics Activities”.EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,
2018, 14(5), 1963-1977,2018
XIV.H.C. Chu, J.M. Chen, & C.L. Tsai, “Effects of an Online Formative Peer-Tutoring Approach on Students’ Learning Behaviours, Performance and Cognitive Load in Mathematics”.Interactive Learning Environments.Vol
25,n2, pp 203-219,2017
XV.I. Amin, & Y.L. Sukestiyarno, “Analysis Metacognitive Skills On Learning Mathematics In High School”. International Journal of Education and Research.Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2015.
XVI.I. Coskun, & C. Eker, “The Effect Of Teaching Activities Done By Using Activity Based Posters On The Students’ Academic Achievements, Retention Levels In Their Learning”. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(4): 585-597, 2018. Doi: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060402,2018
XVII.I. Ullah, R. Tabassum, & M. Kaleem, “Effects of Peer Tutoring on the Academic Achievement of Students in the Subject of Biology at Secondary Level”.Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 112; Doi:10.3390/educsci8030112,2018
XVIII.J.M. Smith, & R. Mancy, “Exploring The Relationship Between Metacognitive And Collaborative Talk During Group Mathematical Problem- Solving – What Do We Mean By Collaborative Metacognition?”, Research in Mathematics Education, 20:1, pp 14-36, Doi:10.1080/ 4794802.2017.1410215,2018
XIX.K. Arrand, “Peer Tutoring”.Journal Pedagogic Development.Volume 4 Issue 1,2014
XX.K. Findley, I. Whitacre, & K. Hensberry, “Integrating Interactive Simulations Into The Mathematics Classroom: Supplementing, Enhancing, Or Driving?” In Galindo, E., & Newton, J., (Eds.). (2017). Proceedings of the 39th Annua