OPTIMAL MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROBABEL MODELING FOR SUPPORTING OF THE POWER GENERATION, REFRIGERATION AND CCHP HEATING UNIT

Authors:

Mohammad Hassan Ghasemian Bejestani,Nader Sargolzai,

DOI NO:

https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.12.00017

Keywords:

Multi Objective Modeling,Power generation,CCHP Heating Unit,Combined Systems,

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-objective optimization model to optimize the performance of the Combined cooling, heat & power (CCHP) strategy in different climates based on cost, energy consumption and carbon gas production. In order to ensure the reliability of the CCHP's performance strategy and potential load power, potential constraints are added to the contingency model and the impact of increasing the level of reliability on contingency constraints on cost, energy consumption and carbon gas production is analyzed. To develop the proposed multi-objective analysis, a model is proposed to reduce primary energy consumption and carbon emissions, and for different atmospheric conditions, values of energy consumption and carbon gas production are determined. Finally, the proposed problem was applied to the cities of San Francisco, Boston, Miami, Minneapolis and Columbus and coded in the GAMS optimization software environment. Then, based on the numerical results, the capabilities of the proposed scheme in support of optimal CCHP performance planning are evaluated.

Refference:

I. W. El-Khattam and M. M. A. Salama, “Distributed generation
technologies, definitions and benefits,” Electr. power Syst. Res., vol. 71,
no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2004.
II. C. Shang, D. Srinivasan, and T. Reindl, “Generation and storage
scheduling of combined heat and power,” Energy, vol. 124, pp. 693–705,
2017.
III. X. Chu, D. Yang, X. Li, and R. Zhou, “Evaluation of CCHP system
performance based on operational cost considering carbon tax,” Energy
Procedia, vol. 142, pp. 2930–2935, 2017.

IV. H. Moradi, I. G. Moghaddam, M. P. Moghaddam, and M. R. Haghifam,
“Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas
emissions for a cogeneration plant,” in 2010 IEEE International Energy
Conference, pp. 785–790,2010.
V. C.-Z. Li, Y.-M. Shi, S. Liu, Z. Zheng, and Y. Liu, “Uncertain
programming of building cooling heating and power (BCHP) system
based on Monte-Carlo method,” Energy Build., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1369–
1375, 2010.
VI. S. Bracco, G. Dentici, and S. Siri, “Economic and environmental
optimization model for the design and the operation of a combined heat
and power distributed generation system in an urban area,” Energy, vol. 55,
pp. 1014–1024, 2013.
VII. A. Smith, R. Luck, and P. J. Mago, “Analysis of a combined cooling,
heating, and power system model under different operating strategies with
input and model data uncertainty,” Energy Build., vol. 42, no. 11, pp.
2231–2240, 2010.
VIII. D. Maraver, A. Sin, J. Royo, and F. Sebastián, “Assessment of CCHP
systems based on biomass combustion for small-scale applications through
a review of the technology and analysis of energy efficiency parameters,”
Appl. Energy, vol. 102, pp. 1303–1313, 2013.
IX. J. Wang, P. Zhao, X. Niu, and Y. Dai, “Parametric analysis of a new
combined cooling, heating and power system with transcritical CO2
driven by solar energy,” Appl. Energy, vol. 94, pp. 58–64, 2012.
X. S. Li, J. Sui, H. Jin, and J. Zheng, “Full chain energy performance for a
combined cooling, heating and power system running with methanol and
solar energy,” Appl. Energy, vol. 112, pp. 673–681, 2013.
XI. E. Cardona, A. Piacentino, and F. Cardona, “Matching economical,
energetic and environmental benefits: an analysis for hybrid CHCP-heat
pump systems,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 47, no. 20, pp. 3530–3542,
2006.
XII. A. A. Jalalzadeh-Azar, “A comparison of electrical-and thermal-loadfollowing
CHP systems,” ASHRAE Trans., vol. 110, p. 85, 2004.
XIII. M. Liu, Y. Shi, and F. Fang, “A new operation strategy for CCHP systems
with hybrid chillers,” Appl. Energy, vol. 95, pp. 164–173, 2012.
XIV. A. Rong and R. Lahdelma, “An efficient linear programming model and
optimization algorithm for trigeneration,” Appl. Energy, vol. 82, no. 1, pp.
40–63, 2005.
XV. J.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Jing, and C.-F. Zhang, “Optimization of capacity and
operation for CCHP system by genetic algorithm,” Appl. Energy, vol. 87,
no. 4, pp. 1325–1335, 2010.
XVI. J. Wang, Z. J. Zhai, Y. Jing, and C. Zhang, “Particle swarm optimization
for redundant building cooling heating and power system,” Appl. Energy,
vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 3668–3679, 2010.
XVII. W. Jiang-Jiang, Z. Chun-Fa, and J. You-Yin, “Multi-criteria analysis of
combined cooling, heating and power systems in different climate zones in
China,” Appl. Energy, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1247–1259, 2010.

XVIII. B. Shi, L.-X. Yan, and W. Wu, “Multi-objective optimization for
combined heat and power economic dispatch with power transmission loss
and emission reduction,” Energy, vol. 56, pp. 135–143, 2013.
XIX. E. Thorin, H. Brand, and C. Weber, “Long-term optimization of
cogeneration systems in a competitive market environment,” Appl. Energy,
vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 152–169, 2005.
XX. S. G. Tichi, M. M. Ardehali, and M. E. Nazari, “Examination of energy
price policies in Iran for optimal conFiguration of CHP and CCHP
systems based on particle swarm optimization algorithm,” Energy Policy,
vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 6240–6250, 2010.
XXI. G. Abdollahi and H. Sayyaadi, “Application of the multi-objective
optimization and risk analysis for the sizing of a residential small-scale
CCHP system,” Energy Build., vol. 60, pp. 330–344, 2013.
XXII. K. C. Kavvadias and Z. B. Maroulis, “Multi-objective optimization of a
trigeneration plant,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 945–954, 2010.
XXIII. M. Liu, Y. Shi, and F. Fang, “Optimal power flow and PGU capacity of
CCHP systems using a matrix modeling approach,” Appl. Energy, vol. 102,
pp. 794–802, 2013.
XXIV. L. Wang and C. Singh, “Stochastic combined heat and power dispatch
based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization,” in 2006 IEEE
Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 8, pp 72-87, 2006.
XXV. L. Coles and R. W. Beck, “Distributed generation can provide an
appropriate customer price response to help fix wholesale price volatility,”
in 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference
Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37194), vol. 1, pp. 141–143, 2001.
XXVI. J. F. Blinn, “A generalization of algebraic surface drawing,” ACM Trans.
Graph., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 235–256, 1982.
XXVII. C. Z. Li, Y. M. Shi, and X. H. Huang, “Sensitivity analysis of energy
demands on performance of CCHP system,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol.
49, no. 12, pp. 3491–3497, 2008.
XXVIII. S. Gamou, R. Yokoyama, and K. Ito, “Optimal unit sizing of cogeneration
systems in consideration of uncertain energy demands as continuous
random variables,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 43, no. 9–12, pp. 1349–
1361, 2002.

View Download