Authors:
Fathi A. Alshamma,Munaf Hadi Salman,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2020.05.00025Keywords:
dynamic crack propagation,stress intensity factor,laser energy,thermal energy,Abstract
In this research, for studying dynamic crack propagation behavior in thin plate, a modified method has adopted, when solidification with laser shot peening with cycling thermal effect have done. Since anew a technique is based on an accumulating two types of energies and employments, these together or alone by [Griffith] approach are used to emulate what happen in fuselage with specific conditions in order to study crack velocity and stress intensity factor. The two energies are coming from laser ray and cycling thermal. Analytical model has built with two scenarios for comparing between them. The first one (oven state) when cycling temperatures range for one cycle is from 30 to 150°C and the second (plane path state) when temperature range decreases from 30 to -30 °C . In addition, the functions (cycling thermal) are functions of duration. Therefore, Fourier series method for periodic functions has built for cycling during path of flight. Oven state for a specific function has assumed with specific shape. Accordingly, simply support condition is adopted for all plates' edges. Laser ray influence has applied according to (P. Peyer & R. Fabbro) equations. For plane path state (cooling), it has been observed that the dynamic crack propagation clearly decreases when the energy of laser was influenced and cycling thermal has increased retardation of crack extension. While for oven state (heating), cycling thermal leads to reducing retardation of crack extension. Also, when comparing between two energies, a high benefit energy is produced from laser (positive effect), and thermal effect depends on state of system if heating or cooling and type of boundary conditions. The values are as well depended on thickness, crack ratio and properties of materialRefference:
I. Burns, J. T., et al. “Fatigue crack propagation of aerospace aluminum alloy 7075-T651 in high altitude environments.” International Journal of Fatigue 106 (2018): 196-207.
II. Duffy, Dean G. Advanced engineering mathematics with MATLAB. Crc Press, 2016.
III. E. Carrera, et al. “Simulation of shock wave impact due to explosion on a flying flexible aircraft.” Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves 43.6 (2007): 732-740.H.L.EWaldsand, R.J.H.Wanhill (1989)”Fracture mechanics”
IV. J. Zhang, et al. “Crack initiation and propagation mechanisms during thermal fatigue in directionally solidified superalloy DZ125.” International Journal of Fatigue 119 (2019): 355-366.
V. M. Sticchi, et al. “Review of residual stress modification techniques for extending the fatigue life of metallic aircraft components.” Applied Mechanics Reviews 67.1 (2015).
VI. Peyre, P., et al. “FEM simulation of residual stresses induced by laser peening.” The European Physical Journal-Applied Physics 23.2 (2003): 83-88.
VII. Peyre, P., et al. “Laser shock processing of aluminium alloys. Application to high cycle fatigue behaviour.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 210.1-2 (1996): 102-113.
VIII. R. A. Everett, et al. “The effects of shot and laser peening on fatigue life and crack growth in 2024 aluminum alloy and 4340 steel.” (2001).
IX. Syed, Abdul Khadar, et al. “Effect of temperature and thermal cycling on fatigue crack growth in aluminium reinforced with GLARE bonded crack retarders.” International Journal of Fatigue 98 (2017): 53-61.
X. Timoshenko, Stephen P., and Sergius Woinowsky-Krieger. Theory of plates and shells. McGraw-hill, 1959.
XI. Y. K. Gao, and X. R. Wu. “Experimental investigation and fatigue life prediction for 7475-T7351 aluminum alloy with and without shot peening-induced residual stresses.” Acta Materialia 59.9 (2011): 3737-3747.