Authors:
Khoa Dang Vo,Phong Thanh Nguyen,Phuong Thanh Phan,DOI NO:
http://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.10.00041Keywords:
Construction projects,civil engineers,fuzzy logic,Job performance,Abstract
Human resources are the most precious asset of society and any civil engineering and construction firms. Experience shows that successful construction companies always focus on recruitment and human resources training. Thus, ranking main factors in measuring the performance of construction engineers is one of the most critical determinations in the success of civil engineering and construction projects. However, traditional methods of evaluating key factors performance of construction engineers are usually based on subjective opinions, resulting in irrational and inappropriate outcomes. Therefore, this paper presents a fuzzy model for ranking critical factors in measuring the performance of construction engineers. The results show that there are five essential factors in measuring the performance of construction engineers in Vietnam: (1) Ability to perform work in accordance with project procedures and accept overtime work; (2) Ability to improve knowledge and skills; and (3) Ability to meet and make a decision with the consensus of a project team; and (4) Ability to communicate exchange and persuade and build good relationships with project members; (5) Planning and scheduling ability.Refference:
I. D. L. Luong, D.-H. Tran, and P. T. Nguyen, “Optimizing multi-mode timecost-
quality trade-off of construction project using opposition multiple
objective difference evolution,” International Journal of Construction
Management, pp. 01-13, 2018.
II. J. J. Buckley, “The fuzzy mathematics of finance,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems,
vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 257-273, 1987.
III. J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17,
no. 3, pp. 233-247, 1985.
IV. N. Hao, Y. Feng, K. Zhang, G. Tian, L. Zhang, and H. Jia, “Evaluation of
traffic congestion degree: An integrated approach,” International Journal of
Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 13, no. 7, 2017.
V. N. T. Phong, V. N. Phuc, and T. T. H. L. N. Quyen, “Application of Fuzzy
Analytic Network Process and TOPSIS Method for Material Supplier
Selection,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 728, pp. 411-415, 2017.
VI. P. T. Nguyen et al., “Construction Project Quality Management using Building
Information Modeling 360 Field,” International Journal of Advanced
Computer Science and Applications, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 228-233, 2018.
VII. P. Van Nguyen, P. T. Nguyen, Q. L. H. Thuy, T. Nguyen, and V. D. B. Huynh,
“Calculating Weights of Social Capital Index Using Analytic Hierarchy
Process,” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 6, no.
3, pp. 1189-1193, 2016.
VIII. T. A. Nguyen and P. T. Nguyen, “Explaining model for supervisor’s behavior
on safety action based on their perceptions,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and
Applied Sciences, Article vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 9562-9572, 2015.
IX. V. D. B. Huynh, P. V. Nguyen, Q. L. H. T. T. Nguyen, and P. T. Nguyen,
“Application of Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process based on Geometric Mean
Method to Prioritize Social Capital Network Indicators,” International Journal
of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 182-186,
2018.