Authors:
Adeed Khan,Asif Subhan,Asif Subhan,Mohammad Adil,Muhammad Amar Rafiq,Mehre Munir,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.04.00007Keywords:
BRT,Risk Identification,risk Assessment,Abstract
Around the world, governments at all levels take part very important roles in organizing the safety and comfort of public transportation systems in the form of BRTs. Huge Construction projects such as BTR are initiated in intricate and dynamic conditions bringing about conditions of high vulnerability and risk, which are compounded by challenging phase restrictions. Constructions of BRT’s have reformed suggestively from the past numerous years. It is a structure obsessed primarily by govt. Sponsors. It is exposed against the several specific and trade risks that habitually speak to more remarkable publicities than those that are conventional. In this manner risk assessment requires develops. Risk taxation is an apparatus to classify those hazards in a task and direct it as requirements be with suitable management. Risk assessment is considered in this research as a strategy that expects to distinguish and appraise those important risks which are related to design, financial and management. The common procedure of this research rest on to a great extent on the review survey which was collected from the client, consultant and contractors of projects. A careful literature review was directed to distinguish the risk issues that influence the enactment of BRTs in general. The inspection questionnaire was designed to investigate the cross sectional behavioral arrangement of construction risks related to the BRT Peshawar. This research wants to classify and evaluate the risks and to improve a hazard supervision framework which the clients/ consultants/ contractors can implement when tightening BRT work in Pakistan.Refference:
I.Anuj Jaiswal,et,al (2012) “BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM: AMILESTONE FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: A CASE STUDY OF JANMARG BRTS, AHMEDABAD, INDIA”
II.American National Standard. (2004). “Project management body of knowledge.”ANSI/PMI 99-001-2004, USA.
III.Edward Thomas, at the Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, August 2001.
IV.Flanagan, R., and Norman, G. (1999). “Risk management and construction.” Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK.
V.Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S., Clinger, J., Rutherford, S., Cracknell, J., and Soberman,R. “Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit -Preliminary Draft Final Report” TCRP A-23,prepared for the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., May 2002
VI.Lotshaw. (20 Jun 2011). Profiles of American BRT: Pittsburgh’s South Busway and East Busway.
VII.Loosemore, M., Raftery, J., Reilly, C., and Higgon, D. (2006). “Risk management in projects.” Taylor & Francis, London.UK.
VIII.Seung H. Han, James E. Diekmann, Young Lee, and Jong H. Ock (2004) “Multi criteria Financial Portfolio Risk Management for International Projects”
IX.Shou Qing Wang, Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi&Muhammad Yousuf Aguria2004 “Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries”
X.Standards Association of Australia. (1999). “Risk management.” AS/NZS 4360, Australia.
XI.American National Standard. (2004). “Project management body of knowledge.”ANSI/PMI 99-001-2004, USA.Terry Lyons and Martin Skitmorè (2004), “PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE QUEENSLAND ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A SURVEY”
XII.Tang, W., Qiang, M., Duffield, C. F., Young, D. M., and Lu, Y.(2007). “Risk management in Chinese construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(12), 944-956.
XIII.http://www.pda.gkp.pk/
Adeed Khan, Asif Subhan, Muhammad Hasnain, Mohammad Adil, Muhammad Amar Rafiq, Mehre Munir View Download