Authors:
Pritish Kumar Ghosh,PradipKumarSadhu,Amarnath Sanyal,Debabrata Roy,Biswajit Dutta,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2018.08.00010Keywords:
Analytic design,synthetic design,hybrid design, optimal design,sequential searching, development of electrical engineering, Electrical applications,Abstract
About 88% of the driving power is produced by 3-phase and single-phase induction motors. In most part it is by squirrel-cage motors, only a small fraction by the slip-ring or phase-wound type. It is because the cage-type motors are relatively inexpensive. But they suffer from low p.f. operation and low starting torque which cannot be manipulated by inserting resistance in the rotor circuit. Also, this type of induction motors is not easily speed-adjustable. Though a little more expensive, the slip-ring type induction motors do not have these disadvantages. Therefore, they are used as speed-adjustable drives and for drives where heavy duty starting is involved. The design of any kind of power equipment should be made cost-optimally in the present day competitive market. A new approach to reaching optimal solution has been shown in this paper by the method of sequential searching with respect to the chosen design variables. Also, another design has been made following a hybrid of analytical and synthetic approach. The design variables have been chosen from designers’ experience. In contrary to the popular belief that there is no need for going in for complexity of optimal design, the quasi-optimal solution may be obtained by the designer from his accumulated experience, we find that the idea is wrong. The optimal design approach saves a lot of money.Refference:
I.Bimbhra, P. S. (1973). Electric machinery. Khanna Publishers, ISBN: 81-7409-016-9.
II.Brunner, C. U. (2007). International standards for electric motors. Standards for Energy efficiency of ElectricMotor systems (SEEEM), 6-10.
III.Cunkas, M., & Amazan, A. R. (2006). Design optimization of induction motor by genetic algorithm and comparison with existing methods. Mathematical and computational Applications, II(3), 103-203.
IV.Deb, K. (2010). Optimization for engineering design. PHI, ISBN 978-81-203-0943-2.
V.Dubey, G. K. (2002). Fundamentals of electric drives. 2nd. Ed, Narosa Publishing House, ISNN: 81-7319-428-9.
VI.Erajskar, G., Bhattacharyya, M., & Mahendra, S. N. (1974). Computer-aided design of three phase squirrel cage induction motor-technical design, hybrid process and optimization. J.I.E (India),E.E. Div., India, 2-50.
VII.Ertan, H. B., & Aykanat, C. (2018). A new approach to optimized design of induction motor. Department of Electrical Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
VIII.Hasanah, R. N. (2009). Energy saving through design optimization of induction motor. Journal EECCIS, 3(1).
IX.Kambo, N. S. (1991). Mathematical programming techniques. Revised edition, Affiliated East-West Press Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi –110 001, ISBN 81-85336-47-4.
X.Kannan, R., Bhuvaneswari, R., & Subramanian, S. (2007). Optimal design of three-phase induction motor using Particle Swarm Optimization. Iranian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 6(2).