Assessment of Data Sophistication in HR functions by Applying Ridit Analysis
Authors:
Sripathi Kalvakolanu, Chendragiri MadhavaiahDOI NO:
http://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.10.00031Abstract:
The wealth of organizations is being determined by the amount of quality data they possess. Organizations across the globe have recognised this phenomenon. With abundance of data along with advanced analytic tools and technologies, many organizations have embraced business analytics into their essential strategic and operational decision-making tools. Heart of business analytics is the data. The quality and value of decision-making outcomes lie with the data inputs supplied. Big data and social media analytics have given impetus to the expansion of business analytics into all critical functional areas of the organization. Though a little late, the domain of HR has also caught up the trend of applying analytics. This new area is termed as people analytics or HR analytics. In this paper, an attempt is made to understand the extent of data availability and usage in analytics, termed as data sophistication in HR analytics in the organizations. As there are no definite ways to determine the data sophistication levels, a response sheet with a set of 20 items is developed based on previous literature. Data is collected from HR professionals. This data is subjected to exploratory factor analysis to capture the important dimensions from the items. Using structural equation modelling, confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to assess the model fit. Based on the resultant model, data is subjected to ridit analysis to interpret the treatment effect intuitively. The findings of the study add to the field of study in the area of data analytics, HR analytics, and decision-making domains. New approaches and study opportunities in related areas can be explored in this area due to its fast-emerging nature.Keywords:
Data analytics,Data sophistication,HR analytics,ridit analysis,Refference:
I. Agresti A. (1984). Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, N.Y.:John Wiley
andSons.
II. Akerkar, R. (2014). Analytics on Big Aviation Data: Turning Data into
Insights. IJCSA, 11(3), 116-127.
III. Barton, D., & Court, D. (2012). Making advanced analytics work for
you. Harvard business review, 90(10), 78-83.
IV. Bross I. (1958).How to Use RIDIT Analysis, Biometrics, 14(1), 18-38.
V. Banerjee, A., Bandyopadhyay, T., &Acharya, P. (2013). Data analytics:
Hyped up aspirations or true potential?. Vikalpa, 38(4), 1-12.
VI. Davenport, T. H., Harris, J., & Shapiro, J. (2010). Competing on talent
analytics. Harvard business review, 88(10), 52-58.
VII. DeRomree, H., Fecheyr-Lippens, B., &Schaninger, B. (2016). People
analytics reveals three things HR may be getting wrong. McKinsey Quarterly.
VIII. Earley, S. (2015). Analytics, machine learning, and the internet of things. IT
Professional, 17(1), 10-13.
IX. Fink, A. A., &Sturman, M. C. (2017). HR Metrics and Talent Analytics. The
Oxford Handbook of Talent Management, 375-390.
X. Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2013), Multivariate
Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7/e., Pearson Education: New Delhi.
XI. Kohavi, R., Rothleder, N. J., &Simoudis, E. (2002). Emerging trends in
business analytics. Communications of the ACM, 45(8), 45-48.
XII. Kiron, D., Shockley, R., Kruschwitz, N., Finch, G., &Haydock, M. (2012).
Analytics: The widening divide. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 1.
XIII. Kaisler, S., Armour, F., Espinosa, J. A., & Money, W. (2013, January). Big
data: Issues and challenges moving forward. In 2013 46th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 995-1004). IEEE.
XIV. Lahrmann, G., Marx, F., Winter, R., &Wortmann, F. (2010, October).
Business intelligence maturity models: an overview. In VII conference of the
Italian chapter of AIS (itAIS 2010). Italian chapter of AIS, Naples.
XV. Levenson, A. (2011): Using targeted analytics to improve talent decisions.
People & Strategy, Vol. 34, pp. 34–43.
XVI. Malladi, S. (2013). Adoption of business intelligence & analytics in
organizations–an empirical study of antecedents.
XVII. Miller, L., Schiller, D., & Rhone, M. (2011). Data warehouse maturity
assessment service. TERADATA. In.
XVIII. Molefe, M. (2014). From data to insights: HR analytics in organisations
(Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
XIX. Poreca, S. (2018). The 4 Sophistication Levels of Data Analysis – Level Blog.
Retrieved from
https://www.northeastern.edu/levelblog/2018/03/28/sophistication-levelsdata-
analysis/
XX. Phillips-Wren, G. E., Iyer, L. S., Kulkarni, U. R., &Ariyachandra, T. (2015).
Business Analytics in the Context of Big Data: A Roadmap for
Research. CAIS, 37, 23.
XXI. Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., & Prentice, P. K. (2016). Beyond the hype: the
hard work behind analytics success. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(3).
XXII. Rex B. Kline. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation
Modeling, The Guilford Press
XXIII. Sahay, B. S., &Ranjan, J. (2008). Real time business intelligence in supply
chain analytics. Information Management & Computer Security, 16(1), 28-
48.
XXIV. Russom, P. (2011). Big data analytics. TDWI best practices report, fourth
quarter, 19(4), 1-34.
XXV. Shanks, G., Bekmamedov, N., & Sharma, R. (2011). Creating value from
business analytics systems: a process-oriented theoretical framework and case
study.
XXVI. Tabachnick, B.G. &Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6thedn).
Boston: Pearson Education.
XXVII. Wu, C. H. (2007). An empirical study on the transformation of Likert-scale
data to numerical scores. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 1(58), 2851-2862.
XXVIII. Watkins, M.W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [computer
software]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
XXIX. Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding
its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare
organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 3-13.