Authors:
D. P. Kothari,Anshumaan Pathak,Utkarsh Pandey ,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2021.02.00009Keywords:
Photo-voltaic cells,Power Enhancement,Partial Shading,series-parallel (SP),total cross-tied (TCT),total cross-tied (TCT),honeycomb (HC),Abstract
Growth of photovoltaic systems that require more and more productive alternatives, not only in micro-fabrication techniques but also in methods of energy extraction. In recent years, a large number of Maximum Power Point Tracking algorithms with various complexities over decades the ability to efficiently locate the global maximum under partial shading was followed by evolved. Partial Shading Conditions (PSC) play a major role in determining the energy and power productivity of a solar photovoltaic (SPV) system. Under PSC, the SPV panels receive varying levels of solar irradiance, resulting in a decrease in the power generation of the SPV system, and these losses in SPV panels can be minimized by adjusting the configuration of the array/module panels. The panels can be designed to increase production energy and power quality in several different configurations, such as Series(S), Parallel (P), Series-Parallel (SP), Complete Cross Tied (TCT), Bridge Linked (BL) and Honeycomb (HC). This work is aimed at presenting all the configurations already presented in the literature and referencing and evaluating the findings of PSC on SPV systems. In this paper, there are four 4-4 array configurations of solar photovoltaic panels to be addressed. Parallel series (SP), complete cross-linked (TCT), the bridge linked (BL) and honeycomb are four configurations (HC). To decide on the effect of shadow with 10 shading patterns, four simulated models were carried out. For the above-mentioned configuration, the simulated results indicate a power against voltage (PV) curve of 4 to 4 SPV array under PSC. This thesis will be a reference point for useful and important knowledge for researchers in the field of solar panels.Refference:
I. Patel H and Agarwal V 2008 Matlab-based modeling to study the effects of partial shading on PV array characteristics. IEEE Transact. on Energy Convers. 23(1) doi: 10.1109/TEC.2007.914308
II. I.S Jha , Subir Sen , Rajesh Kumar & D.P.Kothari “Smart Grid Fundamentals Applications” New Age International Publishers
III. D.P.Kothari , I.J.Nagrath “Power System Engineering – 3rd edition” McGrawHill.
IV. Bidram A, Davoudi A D, and Balog R S 2012 Control and circuit techniques to mitigate partial shading effects in photovoltaic arrays. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2(4) doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2202879
V. Karatepe, E Syafaruddin and Hiyama T 2010 Simple and high-efficiency photovoltaic system under non- uniform operating conditions. IET Renewable Power Generation 4(4) 354 doi:10.1049/iet- rpg.2009.0150
VI. D.P.Kothari,K.C.SingalandRakeshRanjan,“RenewableEnergySourcesandEmerging Technologies”, Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi,3rd edition 2021
VII. D.P.KothariandI.J.Nagrath,”ModernPowerSystemAnalysis,”TataMcGrawHill,New Delhi,1980, fifth edition 2021
VIII. Teo J C, Rodney H G, Vigna V R V, Mok H and Tan C 2018 Impact of partial shading on the p- v characteristics and the maximum power of a photovoltaic string. Energies 11 1860 doi: 10.3390/en11071860
IX. Young-Hyok, J Jung D Kim J_G Kim J H Lee T W and Won C Y 2011 A real maximum power point tracking method for mismatching compensation in PV array under partially shaded conditions.
X. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 26(4) doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2089537
XI. Maki A and Valkealahti S 2012 Power losses in long string and parallel-connected short strings of series- connected silicon-based photovoltaic modules due to partial shading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 27(1) doi: 10.1109/TEC.2011.2175928
XII. Markvart T 2016 From steam engine to solar cells: can thermodynamics guide the development of future generations of photovoltaics? WIREs Energy and Environment doi: 10.1002/wene.204
XIII. Amit Kumar, Rupendra Kumar Pachauri, Yogesh K. Chauhan Experimental Analysis of Proposed SP-TCT, TCT- BL and CT-HC Configurations under Partial shading Conditions
XIV. Seyedmahmoudian M Mekhilef S Rahmani R Yusof R and Shojaei A A 2014 Maximum power point tracking of partial shaded photovoltaic array using an evolutionary algorithm: A particle swarm optimization technique. J. of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 6(2) doi: 10.1063/1.4868025
XV. Pavlovic T and Ban Z 2013 An improvement of incremental conductance MPPT algorithm for PV systems based on the Nelder–Mead optimization. IEEE 6
XVI. Patel Hiren and Vivek Agarwal, “MATLAB-based modelling to study the effects of partial shading on PV array characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 23, no. 1 , pp. 302-310, 2008.
XVII. R. Ramaprabha and B. L. Mathur, “A comprehensive review and analysis of solar photovoltaic array configurations under partial shaded conditions,” International Journal of Photo energy, vol. 2012, 2012.
XVIII. Wang Yaw-Juen and Po-Chun Hsu, “An investigation on partial shading of PV modules with different connection configurations of PV cells,” Energy, vol. 36.5, pp. 3069-3078, 2011.
XIX. Wilson K. Rahul, Y. Srinivasa Rao, : EFFECTS OF PARTIAL SHADING ON DIFFERENT STRUCTURES OF SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS, J. Mech. Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.-6 November-December (2019) pp 845-854