ENHANCING STRUCTURAL RESPONSE USING INERTER DAMPERS

Authors:

Shahad Nazar Jabbar,Waleed K. Al-Ashtari,

DOI NO:

https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2021.01.00008

Keywords:

Inerter damper,enhancing response,ball-screw inerter,

Abstract

This paper deals with one kind of dampers which is inerter damper, Inerter is a new mechanical element proposed by Professor Malcolm C. Smith from Cambridge University, which is defined as a mechanical two-terminal, one-port device with the property that the equal and opposite force applied at the terminals is proportional to the relative acceleration between the terminals the principle work of inerter damper is how to convert the linear motion into rotational motion to mitigation the external excitation. Theoretical analysis was presented first part is the analytical study which made modeling for the damping structure proposed and get the equation of motion for the inerter behavior, secondly numerical analysis where the program (ANSYS WORK-Bench 18.2) was adopted, and study the parameters which effected on the damping behavior of inerter structure proposed that is (stiffness, coefficient of friction and mass of flywheel). Where it was found that when the stiffness of the springs increased gradually from (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) Kn/mm the amplitude reduced from (25.791, 17.194, 12.896, 8.5974 to 6.4482) mm respectively for each stiffness reading, also the mass of inerter when increased gradually (200,400,600,800 and 1000) g with a constant coefficient of friction and constant stiffness 0.4, 0.6 Kn/mm respectively, the amplitude decrease from 6.3525 to 4.036290. Finally, to study the effect inerter mass on the structures, the mass of inerter increased from (200,400,600,800 to 1000) g gradually to the constant cantilever mass structure equal to 130g. The ratio of the inerter mass to the threshold mass is approximately 1.5 to 7.5  As results obtained from the previous study, the amplitude obtained for each mass (1.0778, 1.069, 1.0509, 0.9514 to 0.872) respectively

Refference:

I. A. Siami, A. Cigada, H.R. Karimi, E. Zappa E. Sabbioni , Using inerter-based isolator for passive vibration control of Michelangelo’s Rondanini Pietà, ScienceDirect, IFAC isolator for passive vibration 2017.
II. A.V. Bhaskararao, R.S. Jangid, Seismic analysis of structures connected with friction dampers, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400 076, India.
III. K. Asadi, H.Ahmadian, H.Jalali, Micro/macro-slip damping in beams with frictional contact interface, Journal of Sound and Vibration 331 (2012) , Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran.

IV. Ladislav Pust, Ludˇek Peˇsek, Alena Radolfova, Engineering Mechanics, Various Types of Dry Friction Characteristics for Vibration Damping. Vol.18, 2011, No.3/4, p.203–224.
V. Marcelo Braga dos Santos, Humberto Tronconi Coelho, Francisco Paulo Lepore Neto, Jarir Mafhoud, Assessment of semi-active friction dampers, Mechanical system and signal processing 94 (2017).
VI. Michael Z. Q. Chen • Yinlong Hu, Inerter and Its Application in Vibration Control Systems Nanjing University of Science and Technology Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
VII. Rami Faraj?, Lukasz Jankowski, Cezary Graczykowski, Jan Holnicki-Szulc , Can the inerter be a successful shock-absorber? The case of a ball-screw inerter with a variable thread lead, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
VIII. Y. G. Wu a, L. Li a,b, Y. Fana,b,∗, H.Y.Maa, W.J.Wanga, J.-L. Christenc, M.
Ichchou, Design of semi-active dry friction dampers for steady-state vibration: sensitivity analysis and experimental studies School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

View Download