Authors:
Kawther K Younus,Nabil H Hadi,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2020.01.00006Keywords:
Mobile robot,Nonholonomic,DDWMR,Optimum,PSO,control,Abstract
This work studies the trajectory tracking of a non-holonomic WMR. A type of back stepping method in conjunction with Lyapunov method were used for deriving two controllers. But, in non-linear systems controllers may not be enough to reach a good performance. Different cases of trajectory where studied such as (straight line, circular, elliptical, sinusoidal, and infinity shape trajectory) to examine the WMR control system utilizing MATLAB (R2018a)/Simulink to simulate the results. In addition, particle swarm optimization technique was utilized to determine the controllers' parameters by implementing the summation absolute compound error for the position (x, y), the orientation 𝛽, the linear and angular velocity (𝑣,𝜔 ), and the energy. Results showed a very good matching between simulation and the desired trajectory where all errors converge to zero.Refference:
I. A. Sofi, B. R. Phanikumar, “An experimental investigation on flexural
behaviour of fibre-reinforced pond ash-modified concrete”, Ain Shams
Engineering Journal. vol. 6, pp: 1133-1142, 2015.
II. Fareh R, Saad M, Khadraoui S, and Rabie T 2016. Lyapunov-based
tracking control for nonholonomic wheeled mobile robot. J. International
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. V10. PP1042-1047.
III. García-Sánchez J, et al 2017 Mexico. Tracking control for mobile robots
considering the dynamics of all their subsystems: experimental
implementation.P1-18.
IV. Hadi N 2005 Iraq. Fuzzy control of mobile robot in slippery environment.
J. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal. V1.pp41-51.Bakharev T.,
“Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate
solutions”, Cement and Concrete Research. vol. 35, no. 6, pp: 1233-1246,
2005
V. Han P. et al 2016 USA. “Path planning for a mobile robot using ant colony
optimization and the influence of critical obstacle”. C. International
Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Detroit.
VI. Klancar G. et al. 2017 UK, USA. B. “WHEELED MOBILE ROBOTICS”
VII. Leenaa N. and Sajub K.K. 2016 India. “Modelling and trajectory tracking
of wheeled mobile robots”. J. Procedia Technology. V24. PP538 – 545.
VIII. Maghenem M. et al 2017 France. “Global tracking-stabilization control of
mobile robots with parametric uncertainty”. J. International Federation of
Automatic Control. V50. PP4114–4119.
IX. Nurmaini S. et al 2017. “Differential-Drive Mobile Robot Control Design
based-on Linear Feedback Control Law”. C. IAES International Conference
on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics. S755. PP1-7
X. Obaid M, Husain A, Al-Kubati A 2016. Robust backstepping tracking
control of mobile Robot Based on Nonlinear Disturbance Observer. J.
International Journal of Electrical and computer engineering (IJECE) .V6.
PP901-908.
XI. Pandey A. and Parhi D. R. 2017 India. “Optimum path planning of mobile
robot in unknown static and dynamic environments using Fuzzy-Wind
Driven Optimization algorithm”. J. Defence Technology. V13. PP47-58.
XII. Saleh A. L. et al, 2018 Iraq. “Design fuzzy neural petri net controller for
trajectory tracking control of mobile robot”. J. International Journal of
Engineering & Technology. V7. PP1-13
XIII. Shih C, and Lin L 2017 Taiwan. Trajectory planning and tracking control
of differential drive mobile robot in a picture drawing application.P1-15.
XIV. Tawfik M, Abdulwahb E, and Swadi S 2014 Iraq. Trajectory tracking
control for a wheeled mobile robot using fractional order PID controller. J.
Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal. V10. PP39- 52
XV. Tzafestas S 2014 Greece. B. Introduction to mobile robot control.
XVI. Younus K. K. and Hadi N. H. 2019 Iraq. “Path tracking and backstepping
control for a wheeled mobile robot (WMR) in a slipping environment”. C.
3,d International Conference on Engineering Sciences: ICES