Modern Approaches to Preservation and Reconstruction of Historical Industrial Facilities

Authors:

Salem M. Khalabi,Dmitry S. Chayko,Olga G. Plotnikova,Massimode Maria,Aleksandr S. Chikunov ,

DOI NO:

https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.03.00058

Keywords:

Integration,Humanization,Industrial Architecture,Social-Cultural Problems,Reconstruction of Industrial Heritage,

Abstract

This article discusses the problems of reconstruction and integration of historical monuments of industrial architecture and production facilities apart from the monuments. The problem of preservation and utilization of industrial projects, their integration into the urban environment is particularly acute in modern cities not only of Russia but of the whole world. Simultaneously, the changes in the social, political, and economic spheres of society occurring in the last decades mean a necessity to develop new positions in understanding of the effectiveness and appropriateness of the use of all that huge building, scientific-technical, technological and cultural potential, created in the period of formation and development of industrial companies. Increasingly there is a tendency of growth of any consideration of the production facility from the point of view of not only material but also social and aesthetic values. The article provides examples of both Russian and foreign practices of preservation and integration of industrial facilities explaining in details how this problem is solved in the course of experimental design by students of Russian architectural universities.

Refference:

I.Anisimov A. V. (2015) «Neopoznannye» obiekty arhitektury. [“Unidentified” objects of architecture.] Academia. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo, 4: 32 -42. https://archi.ru/lib/book.html?id=2146113528

II.Artjomov E. T., Postnikov S. P. (1994) Industrial’noe nasledie kak faktor aktualizacii istoricheskoj pamjati [Industrial heritage as a factor of actualization of historical memory] Sohranenie industrial’nogo nasledija: mirovoj opyt i rossijskie problemy. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii TICCIH. Ekaterinburg IIA URO RAN: 195 –199.https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28375258

III.Voronina N. V. (2006) Formirovanie promishlennogo raiyona v ust’e Nevi / Istoriko-kul’turnie aspekti [The formation of the industrial area at the mouth of the Neva river. / Historical and cultural aspects] PhD. Thesis, St. Petersburg, Russia.http://www.dissercat.com/content/formirovanie-promyshlennogo-raiona-v-uste-nevy-istoriko-kulturnye-aspekty

IV.Grigorjan G. G. (1997) Rossija i Zapadnaja Evropa: vzaimodejstvie industrial’nyh kul’tur 1700 –1950 [Russia and West Europe: interaction of industrial cultures, 1700 –1950″]Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. –Ekaterinburg: Bank kul’turnoj informacii, Ekaterinburg: 137 -138.https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25473747

V.Dubnov A. P. (1994) Industrial’nost’ i kul’tura v XXI veke. Problemy konvergencii [Industrial and culture in the twenty-first century. Problems of convergence] Sohranenie industrial’nogonasledija: mirovoj opyt i rossijskie problemy. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii TICCIH. Ekaterinburg IIA URO RAN: 261 -262.http://i.uran.ru/nasledie/content/sohranenie-industrialnogo-naslediya-mirovoy-opyt-i-rossiyskie-problemy

VI.Koval’chenko I. D. (2003) Metodi istoricheskogo issledovaniia [Methods of historical research], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.http://aik-sng.ru/node/273

VII.Morozov V.J. (2014) Tendencii razvitija promyshlennogo pivovarenija v Rossii v 1880–1890-h godah. [Trends in the development of industrial brewing in Russia in 1880-1890-ies.] Nauchno-metodicheskij jelektronnyj zhurnal “KONCEPT”, 3: 76-80. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2014/14068.htm. -03.2016.

VIII.Snitko A.V. (2011) Primery razvitija arhitekturnoj sredy istoricheskih promyshlennyh predprijatij. [Examples of the development of the architectural environment of historical industrial enterprises.] Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo, 1: 11 -13.http://www.pgs1923.ru/russian/rindex.htm

IX.Snitko A.V. (2015) Istoricheskaja evoljucija sistemy celevyh ustanovok arhitekturnogo formirovanija proizvodstvennyh zdanij (na primere promyshlennyh predprijatij central’noj rossii). [Historical evolution of the system targets the architectural formation of industrial buildings (for example, industrial enterprises in the Central Russia).] Academia. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo, 1: 57 -60.http://www.raasn.ru/public/academia_2015_1.pdf

X.Titova L.O. (2015) Arhitekturnoe osveshhenie dorevoljucionnyh fabrik v Moskve. [Architectural lighting of factories in pre-revolutionary Moscow.] Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii, 10: 38 -40.http://www.asrmag.ru/arch/240/

XI.Titova L.O. (2016) Ocenka kriteriev cennosti promyshlennogo nasledija. [ Evaluation criteria the values of industrial heritage]Fundamentnye i prikladnye nauki segodnja. Materialy VII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Create Space: 1 –3.https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25082214

XII.Shtiglic M. S. (2010) V otsutstvii gorodskoj strategii. [In the absence of a city strategy.] Arhitektura restavracija dizajn i stroitel’stvo,4(47), 8-1. http://www.d-c.spb.ru/archiv/47/3.html

View | Download