Authors:
Pavel Oleynik,Ivan Doroshin,Ruben Kazaryan,Elen Bilonda Tregubova,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2025.03.00010Keywords:
Deterministic Calculations,Elasticity Moduli of the Roadbed,Geometric and Strength Characteristics,Road Pavement,Structure Reliability,Structural Layer Thickness,Strength of the Structure,Abstract
The process of selection and evaluation of organizational solutions is considered. Five approaches to the evaluation of organizational solutions used in domestic practice are disclosed, indicating the area of their application. Based on a comparative analysis, the paper provides evidence for the fundamental distinctions between the mathematical and applied methods of selecting optimal solutions. The mathematical process is presented as a search for the best solution to problems and as a process of finding an extremum. The applied process is presented in the form of various indicators and their combinations. The arguments presented suggest that relying on a singular approach and a single metric for evaluating organizational solutions is deemed unfeasible. The paper substantiates the provisions of probability theory and mathematical statistics in the design of transport facilities, organization of construction, and operation of roads. Ensuring the specified reliability of a transport facility requires taking into account probabilistic factors both at the design stage and at the stages of construction and operation of the facility.Refference:
I. A. Alekseev, A. Golovin, G. Romanov, Time saving coefficient in construction (Construction Economy, 6, Moscow, 1971), pp. 7–11.
II. A. Elyamany, I. Basha and T. Zayed, “Performance evaluating model for construction companies: Egyptian case study,” in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 133, 8, 574–581 (2007). 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:8(574)
III. A. Kotelnikova, I. Penkova, A. Krasnov, A. Mottaeva, R. Kazaryan, D. Dinets, and T. Saifuddin, “Service Economy Strategies for Addressing Fluoride Levels in Tea Leaves: Insights from Science and Management” in Fluoride: Quarterly Journal of The International Society for Fluoride Research Inc., Article No. 278 (2024). https://repository.rudn.ru/en/records/article/record/163044/
IV. A.A. Gusakov, Fundamentals of designing the organization of construction production (in the conditions of ACS) (Stroyizdat, Moscow, 1977), p. 287. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01007669284
V. A.A. Lapidus and P.P. Oleinik, “Justification of the process of selecting organizational and technological solutions,” in Industrial and civil construction, 4, 70-74 (2024). https://mgsu.ru/news/2024/05-08-2024-2024pgs04.pdf
VI. A.D. Kirnev, Organization of construction production (Lan Publishing House, St. Petersburg, 2019), p. 528 https://djvu.online/file/V5qnFFvCnIVSw
VII. A.L. Filahtov, Method of quantitative expression of unevenness of construction production (Stroytelnoye proizvodstvo, Kyiv, 1966), pp. 80–89.
VIII. A.V. Baranovsky, Design of the organization of construction work (Gosstroyizdat, Moscow, 1933), p. 214 https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01009266614
IX. C.W. Kam and S.L. Tag, “Development and implementation of quality assurance in construction works in Singapore and Hong Kong,” in International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 14, 9 (1997). 10.1108/02656719710186830
X. D. Baccarini, “Estimating project cost continency-a model and exploration of re-search questions.” in Proceedings of the ARCOM 20th Annual Conference. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, (2004), pp. 105–113. https://arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2004-0105-0113_Baccarini.pdf
XI. D. Zhdanova, A. Budrin, A. Krasnov, G. Silkina, D. Dinets, A. Mottaeva, R. Kazaryan, A. Lisenkova, V. Buniak, and O. Solodchenkova, “Implementing Effective Service Economy Strategies to Reduce Fluoride Uptake in Clover Fodder: Risk Management in Livestock,” in Fluoride: Quarterly Journal of The International Society for Fluoride Research Inc., Article No. 283 (2024). https://repository.rudn.ru/en/records/article/record/163226/
XII. E.P. Ubarov, O.B. Belostotsky, Combined flow-line assembly of industrial buildings and structures (Stroyizdat, Moscow, 1974), p. 231 https://e-catalog.nlb.by/Record/BY-NLB-rr32531390000
XIII. H.B. Kim and Y.S. Kim, “Performance indices for quantitative measurement of R&D results in private construction companies,” in KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, 4, 814–830 (2015). 10.1007/s12205-015-2369-6
XIV. I.G. Galkin, Questions of rhythm and reserve in construction (Gosstroyizdat, Moscow, 1962), 170 p.
XV. Instructions for determining the economic efficiency of capital investments in construction. SN423-71 (Stroyizdat, Moscow, 1972), p. 113 https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4294851/4294851545.pdf
XVI. J.L. Burati and T.H. Oswald, “Implementing total quality management in engineering and construction,” in Journal of Management in Engineering, (1993), pp. 456–470. 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:1(8)
XVII. L.G. Dikman, Organization of construction production (ASV Publishing House, Moscow, 2002), p. 512 https://studfile.net/preview/20631093/
XVIII. L.V. Kovaleva, Organization and planning in construction (Publishing House of POSU, Khabarovsk, 2016), p. 137. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008641313
XIX. M.S. Acha, N.G. Amosov and L.M. Kaplan, Planning and management of construction using computers (Stroyizdat, Moscow, 1969), 184 p.
XX. M.S. Budnikov, P.I. Nedavniy and V.I. Rybalsky, Fundamentals of flow-line construction (Gosstroyizdat of the Ukrainian SSR, Kyiv, 1961), 414 p.
XXI. N. Kano, “Attractive quality and must-be quality,” in The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, Vol. 04, 1, 39–48 (1984). 10.20684/quality.14.2_147
XXII. O.A. Vutke, Functional-flow method in standard construction. General methodology of flow organization (Gosstroyizdat, Moscow, 1932), 55 p.
XXIII. P.P. Oleinik, Industrial and mobile methods of construction of enterprises, buildings and structures (ASV, Moscow, 2021), p. 488 p. https://www.litres.ru/book/p-p-oleynik-8340298/organizaciya-stroitelnogo-proizvodstva-17182380/
XXIV. R. Kazaryan and E. Bilonda Tregubova, “Assessment of the efficiency of using information modeling technology for buildings and structures as a construction security planning tool,” in Revista De La Universidad Del Zulia, 3ª época, Año 13, 36, 305–322 (2022). 10.46925//rdluz.36.20
XXV. R. Kazaryan, E. Bilonda Tregubova, R. Avetisyan, and I. Doroshin, “Modeling of organizational and technological solutions for quality management of the installation of the structural layers of asphalt concrete,” in Revista De La Universidad Del Zulia, 3ª época, Año 14, 39, 313–332 (2023). 10.46925//rdluz.39.17
XXVI. R. Kazaryan, E. Bykowa, J. Volkova, O. Pirogova, S. Barykin, and P. Kuhtin, “The impact of digitalization on the practice of determining economical cadastral valuation,” in Frontiers in Energy Research, Article No. 982976, (2022). 10.3389/fenrg.2022.982976
XXVII. R. Kazaryan, P. Oleynik, I. Doroshin, and E. Bilonda Tregubova, “Aspects of Heuristic Method of Forming and Assessing the Plan of Contractor Works,” in Revista De La Universidad Del Zulia, 3ª época. Año 15, 42, 245–260 (2024). 10.46925//rdluz.42.14
XXVIII. R. Kazaryan, S. Ullah, S. Barykin, M. Jianfu, T. Saifuddin, and M.A. Khan, “Green Practices in Mega Development Projects of China–Pakistan Economic Corridor,” in Sustainability 15 (5870), (MDPI, Switzerland, 2023), Article No. 5870. 10.3390/su15075870
XXIX. R.R. Kazaryan, D.A. Garanin, N.S. Lukashevich, V. Buniak, S.V. Efimenko, A. Parfenov, S. Barykin, and I. Chernorutsky, “Reduction of uncertainty using adaptive modeling under stochastic criteria of information content”, in Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Sec. Mathematics of Computation and Data Science, Vol. 8, Article No. 1092156 (2023). 10.3389/fams.2022.1092156
XXX. Recommendations on the methodology for drafting construction organization projects and work production projects (USSR Gosstroy TsNIIOMTP, Moscow, 1968), p. 110. https://dwg.ru/dnl/13930
XXXI. T.T. Chong, “Quality management in the construction industry – the Singaporo experience,” in Quality Management in Building and Construction, Proceedings of Eureka Conference (Hamar, Lilehammer, 1990), pp. 55–60.
XXXII. V. Kersuliene, B.K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA),” in Journal of business economics and management, Vol. 11, 2, 243–258 (2010). 10.3846/jbem.2010.12
XXXIII. V. A. Avilov, Mathematical and statistical methods of technical and economic analysis of production (Ekonomika, Moscow, 1967), p. 264. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01005974341